by Mahmud Tim Kargbo
In the realm of journalism, the pursuit of truth and accuracy is paramount. However, the intricacies of Justice TV/Radio online news production, editorial decisions, and media operations often reveal a complex landscape where factors such as bias, sensationalism, and desperation for making money at all cost often come into play. I am delving into these issues, shedding light on the nuances of Justice TV/ Radio Online news reporting and their impacts of a culture of deception within the media industry. This article seeks to explore the key themes and insights presented in Justice TV/Radio Online work on the land dispute news they reported between the Deputy Minister of Mineral Resources, Hon. Umaru Napoleon Koroma and Hon. Hawa Saffa. I examine how Justice TV/Radio Online journalism operates in the context of truth and integrity.
Exposing the Culture of Justice TV /Radio Online Lying:
Did Justice TV/Radio Online create the enabling environment for the Deputy Minister of Mineral Resources (Hon. Umaru Napoleon Koroma) to give his own side of the stoey before they published the land dispute news between Hon. Hawa Saffa and Hon. Umaru Napoleon Koroma?
Answer : No, Boima called Hon. Umaru Napoleon Koroma and said he has information regarding the dispute. The Deputy Minister of Mineral Resources asked for a meeting between them at his office. He honoured the invitation and they agreed he should come the next day to hear his own side of the story and collect all relevant documents to support his side of the story. They agreed to meet on 3 pm the next day. In the morning of the next day, Justice TV/Radio online had already gone ahead with a publication on the said story.
With such an act, I delve into the culture of dishonesty and deceit that permeate Justice TV/Radio Online journalism, highlighting instances where their pursuit of character assassination stories, or desperate money making agendas often overshadow their commitment to truth-telling. By examining the Gloucester and Bathurst land dispute as a case study and examples from the field, I uncovered how Justice TV/ Radio Online often succumb to the temptation of embellishing facts, omitting crucial information, or resorting to misinformation to fuel narratives or boost viewership. This culture of lying by Justice TV/Radio Online can erode public trust in them and undermine their essential role as a watchdog of democracy.
Exploring Ethical Challenges in Justice TV/ Radio Online Journalism:
On 11th May, 2024, Justice TV/Radio Online published an article in which they stated that the Deputy Minister of Mineral Resources Hon. Umaru Napoleon Koroma “has no document to claim ownership of the said land “. They rely on a document dated on the 11th January, 2018
This shows how Justice TV/Radio Online is desperate to engage in character smearing activities against the Deputy Minister of Mineral Resources. If they had contacted the Deputy Minister of Mineral Resources before their publication, they would have realised that the Ministry of Lands, Surveys and Country Planning did conduct an investigation on the said land and published their report on 27th, August 2014. Here’s a summary of their report :
This property is also free from disputes. It is well demarcated with beacons and concrete pillars, and their positions dimensions are firmly fixed and accurate by measurement.
From the above background, I have no hesitation to recommend the said plans for further processing
Now, considering the above recommendation and in the interest of ethical journalism, whose fault is it if the Ministry of Lands Surveys and Country Planning failed to process the said plans as recommended by their own very expert ?
Ethical dilemmas are a central theme in my analysis of journalism practice by Justice TV/Radio Online, particularly concerning the balance between competing interests such as the pressures to make money at all cost and ethical responsibilities towards their audience. I delve into the ethical considerations that Justice TV /Radio Online must navigate when faced with conflicting demands, highlighting the importance of upholding integrity, accuracy, and independence in reporting the Gloucester and Bathurst land dispute. By examining how ethical lapses or compromises continue to compromise the very essence of their journalistic work in the said dispute, I prompts them to reflect on the principles that should guide ethical journalism practices when reporting the matter.
Navigating Bias and Objectivity in Justice TV /Radio Online Journalism:
In their character smearing publication, Justice TV/Radio Online deliberately ignored the following:
Albademba, went to court to recover possession of the land on his own document which is the subject of division of the fake document of the 97 acres of land. He took the defendants to court who argued that their own 30 acres did not reach the area Albademba was claiming.
In their own blackmailing, Justice TV/Radio Online has admitted that it was Mohamed Lansana who did the survey of the land in question. Mohaned Lansana, started working at the Ministry of Lands around 2005, but the document Ekundice Thomas is crying is dated in 1991.
So, how can a surveyor who worked at the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Country Planning around 2005 survey a land at Gloucester in 1991 ?
Its important for readers to understand that Ekundice Thomas document was not part of the investigations at the court by then.
My work in this article also tackles the complexities of bias and objectivity in Justice TV /Radio Online news reporting, emphasising the importance of distinguishing between facts and opinions in journalism. In a media landscape where lies and ideological influences can shape narratives, Justice TV/Radio Online must strive for objectivity, fairness, and balance in their reporting to provide their audiences with a comprehensive and unbiased view of events. I underscores the challenges of Justice TV /Radio Online steering clear of bias and subjectivity in a field where diverse perspectives and competing interests are at play.
Reaffirming Justice TV /Radio Online Commitment to Truth:
Ultimately, ” Exploring Justice TV/Radio Online Culture of Lying in Journalism”, serves as a poignant reminder of the fundamental importance of truth-telling and integrity in Justice TV/Radio Online journalism. My insights shed light on the ethical challenges and complexities that Justice TV /Radio face in a rapidly evolving media landscape, urging a renewed commitment to transparency, accountability, and ethical Justice TV /Radio Online journalism practices. By reiterating the foundational principles of journalism and the enduring value of truth in storytelling, My work prompts readers to critically engage with the role of Justice TV /Radio Online in shaping public discourse and fostering informed citizenship.
My exploration of Justice TV/Radio Online news and their culture of lying in journalism provides a thought-provoking examination of the challenges, ethical dilemmas, and responsibilities inherent in the field of news reporting. Through a nuanced analysis of media practices, biases, and ethical considerations, I invites their readers and listeners to reflect on the complexities of journalistic integrity and the imperative of upholding truth in an age of rapid information dissemination. As we navigate the ever-evolving media landscape, my insights serve as a compelling call to reexamine the principles that underpin journalism and reaffirm the pivotal role of the media in fostering a well-informed, democratic society.
