By Hon. Abdul Kargbo
The recent suspension of the Youth Envoy for allegedly defrauding Sierra Leoneans with fake travel opportunities, as well as the recall of the Sierra Leonean Ambassador to Guinea, are steps that demonstrate action, but they are far from sufficient in tackling the deep-seated issues of corruption and accountability in our country. These measures, while necessary, do not go far enough in restoring public trust or ensuring that such fraudulent activities do not happen again.
Corruption in Sierra Leone has long been a critical challenge, eroding trust in public institutions, hindering economic development, and staining our country’s reputation on the international stage. The alleged misconduct of the Youth Envoy is particularly troubling because it not only betrays the aspirations of young Sierra Leoneans seeking legitimate opportunities but also reinforces the perception that government officials can exploit their positions for personal gain with minimal consequences. Simply suspending the official in question does not send a strong enough message to deter others who may be engaged in similar schemes. If the government is truly committed to fighting corruption, there should be a thorough and transparent investigation, with legal consequences for anyone found guilty. Without real accountability, suspensions and dismissals will remain empty gestures rather than effective deterrents.
Similarly, recalling the Sierra Leonean Ambassador to Guinea does little to repair the damage done to our nation’s reputation. Diplomatic representatives are meant to uphold the integrity of the country they serve, and any action that compromises that integrity should be met with serious consequences. Recalling an ambassador may be a necessary first step, but it does not clarify whether wrongdoing occurred, nor does it ensure that similar incidents will be prevented in the future. The government must communicate clearly to the public about the reasons for the recall, ensure that proper investigations are conducted, and implement measures to prevent misconduct within our diplomatic corps.
The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) of Sierra Leone should not need reminders to do its job effectively. Its mandate is clear: to investigate, prevent, and prosecute corrupt activities regardless of political affiliation. However, there has been a troubling pattern in which the ACC appears to act more aggressively against opposition figures while showing leniency toward those within the ruling establishment. This selective application of justice only serves to deepen public skepticism about the commission’s integrity and effectiveness.
